CESTAT upholds appellant's victory, rejects Revenue's appeal on penalty. Valid explanation for price difference. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, rejected the Revenue's appeal regarding a penalty that was set aside by the Commissioner. The Tribunal found a ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
CESTAT upholds appellant's victory, rejects Revenue's appeal on penalty. Valid explanation for price difference.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, rejected the Revenue's appeal regarding a penalty that was set aside by the Commissioner. The Tribunal found a valid explanation for the price difference and condoned the delay, upholding the decision in favor of the appellant.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, in Citation 2004 (5) TMI 115, heard an appeal accompanied by a condonation of delay application. The appeal was about a penalty, which the Commissioner had set aside. The Tribunal found a valid explanation for the price difference and rejected the Revenue's appeal, condoning the delay.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.