Small Scale Exemption and brand name use: composite product naming did not deny SSI benefit or justify clubbing clearances.

Small scale exemption under Notification No. 1/93-C.E. could not be denied merely because the goods bore the expression "Varco Sara India (P) Ltd.", as that composite wording was not treated as another person's brand name simply because it contained a matching element. The revenue had to show that the name on the goods belonged to another person in the relevant sense, and that burden was not satisfied. Clubbing of clearances with another unit was also rejected because the demand against the other unit had not been pursued in a manner that would justify clubbing against the respondent alone. The respondent was therefore treated as an independent manufacturer entitled to SSI benefit.

---

---

Issues: Whether the respondent was entitled to small scale exemption under Notification No. 1/93-C.E. notwithstanding the use of the expression "Varco Sara India (P) Ltd." on the goods, and whether clubbing of clearances with another unit was justified.

Analysis: The appeal proceeded on two grounds, but the demand against the other unit had not been carried further in a manner that would sustain clubbing against the respondent alone. The respondent was treated as an independent manufacturer, and the revenue was required to establish that the name appearing on the goods belonged to another person in the relevant sense. The wording "Varco Sara India (P) Ltd." was not treated as identical to the brand name "Varco" merely because one element of the expression matched the collaborator's name. The reasoning also noted that a composite name with a suffix does not, by itself, amount to use of another's brand name for denying SSI benefit.

Conclusion: The respondent's goods were not held to bear another person's brand name so as to disentitle it from SSI exemption, and the request to club clearances was rejected.

---