TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal Upholds Small Scale Exemption, Rejects Revenue's Appeal on Brand Name and Clearance Clubbing Issues.</h1> <h3>COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MEERUT Versus VARCO SARA INDIA (P) LTD.</h3> COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MEERUT Versus VARCO SARA INDIA (P) LTD. - 2004 (171) E.L.T. 79 (Tri. - Del.) Issues involved: The dispute relates to respondent's claim for small scale exemption and brand name, as well as clubbing of clearances.Small Scale Exemption Issue: The case involved M/s. Sara Services and Engineers (P) Ltd. claiming small scale exemption under Notification No. 1/93-C.E. The dispute arose when Central Excise Officers alleged that the respondent was affixing the brand name 'Varco' on their products, which belonged to their foreign collaborator, M/s. Varco B.J. The officers visited the factory and found the brand name 'Varco Sara' on the products. The department argued that the use of 'Varco' on invoices and letterheads indicated a connection to M/s. Varco B.J. However, the respondents contended that they used 'Varco Sara (I) Pvt. Ltd.' on their products and had not paid any royalty to M/s. Varco B.J. The Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the respondent's appeal, stating that the use of 'Varco Sara (I) Pvt. Ltd.' did not disqualify them from the small scale exemption.Brand Name Issue: The Revenue challenged the use of the brand name 'Varco' by the respondents, claiming it belonged to M/s. SSAE or Varco B.J. The Tribunal rejected this argument, stating that even if the word 'Varco' was similar to the foreign company's brand, the addition of 'Sara India (P) Ltd.' made it distinct. Citing a previous judgment, the Tribunal held that suffixing words like 'Mastana' or 'Parwana' after a brand name did not constitute the use of that brand name. Therefore, the Tribunal concluded that the respondent's use of 'Varco Sara (I) Pvt. Ltd.' did not disqualify them from the small scale exemption based on brand name ownership.Clubbing of Clearances Issue: The Revenue sought to club the clearances of the respondents with M/s. SSAE and deny them the small scale exemption. However, the Tribunal noted that the grounds presented were contradictory. The Tribunal emphasized that duty liability rests on the manufacturer, and in this case, the respondents were to be treated as an independent manufacturer. As the claim against M/s. SSAE was abandoned, the Tribunal rejected the appeal to club clearances and confirmed the respondents' independent status.Conclusion: The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's appeal, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals) decision that the respondents were eligible for the small scale exemption and that the brand name 'Varco Sara (I) Pvt. Ltd.' did not infringe on another entity's rights. The impugned order-in-appeal was deemed correct in law, and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
TaxTMI 