Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount payable under Rule 57CC of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was required to be pre-deposited under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and whether recovery should be stayed pending disposal of the appeal.
Analysis: The Tribunal followed its coordinate Bench ruling that the amount payable under Rule 57CC does not amount to duty. Since Section 35F applies to duty, the amount was held not liable to pre-deposit. On that basis, the appellants were entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and protection against recovery pending final disposal of the appeal. The request for out-of-turn hearing was also accepted in view of the size of the demand.
Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee. Pre-deposit was waived and recovery stayed till disposal of the appeal.
Final Conclusion: The stay applications succeeded, and the matter was listed for expedited hearing with interim protection granted to the appellants.
Ratio Decidendi: An amount payable under Rule 57CC of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 is not duty for the purpose of Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and therefore cannot be insisted upon as a pre-deposit.