Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1987 (4) TMI 8 - SC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Assistant Director's Summons Power Denied, Appeals Dismissed The Supreme Court upheld the Calcutta High Court's decision that the Assistant Director of Inspection lacked the authority to issue summons under Section ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Assistant Director's Summons Power Denied, Appeals Dismissed

                          The Supreme Court upheld the Calcutta High Court's decision that the Assistant Director of Inspection lacked the authority to issue summons under Section 131 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court deemed the issue moot following the 1975 amendment explicitly granting the Assistant Director such power. As a result, the appeals were dismissed without costs.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Interpretation of Sections 131 and 135 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
                          2. Jurisdiction of the Assistant Director of Inspection to issue summons under Section 131.
                          3. Validity of the amendment to Section 131 in 1965.
                          4. Application of the maxim generalia specialibus non-derogant.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Interpretation of Sections 131 and 135 of the Income-tax Act, 1961:

                          The main question revolved around whether the Assistant Director of Inspection had the authority to issue a summons under Section 131 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Section 131 grants certain powers to specified authorities, including the Income-tax Officer, Appellate Assistant Commissioner, Inspecting Assistant Commissioner, and Commissioner, akin to those of a court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. These powers include discovery and inspection, enforcing attendance, compelling the production of documents, and issuing commissions. Section 135 states that the Director of Inspection, Commissioner, and Inspecting Assistant Commissioner shall have all the powers of an Income-tax Officer for making any enquiry under the Act.

                          2. Jurisdiction of the Assistant Director of Inspection to issue summons under Section 131:

                          The respondents argued that the Assistant Director of Inspection did not have jurisdiction to issue the summons under Section 131, as he was not one of the authorities mentioned in that section. The Department countered by stating that Section 135 empowered the Assistant Director of Inspection to exercise all the powers of an Income-tax Officer, including those under Section 131. The trial judge, K. L. Roy J., rejected this argument, stating that Section 131 specifically empowers only the officers mentioned therein to exercise those powers, and Section 135 does not extend these powers to the Assistant Director of Inspection for issuing summons.

                          3. Validity of the amendment to Section 131 in 1965:

                          The petitioners argued that the 1965 amendment to Section 131, which added the "Inspecting Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax" to the list of authorities, would have been unnecessary if the Department's interpretation of Section 135 were correct. This amendment indicated that the Legislature did not intend for Section 135 to confer the powers under Section 131 to any officer not explicitly mentioned in Section 131. The trial judge agreed with this interpretation, emphasizing that the amendment was made to specifically include the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner, which would not have been needed if Section 135 already conferred such powers.

                          4. Application of the maxim generalia specialibus non-derogant:

                          The trial judge applied the maxim generalia specialibus non-derogant, meaning that general provisions do not detract from specific provisions. He concluded that Section 135 is a general provision, while Section 131 is a special provision. Therefore, Section 135 cannot be used to extend the specific powers granted under Section 131 to officers not explicitly mentioned in that section. The judge held that the Assistant Director of Inspection did not have the authority to issue the summons under Section 131, and the proceedings were quashed.

                          Conclusion:

                          The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Calcutta High Court, agreeing that the Assistant Director of Inspection did not have the authority to issue summons under Section 131. However, the Court noted that the issue had become academic due to the amendment of Section 131 by Act 41 of 1975, which explicitly conferred the power to issue summons on the Assistant Director of Inspection. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed without costs.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found