1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Tribunal dismisses appeal, upholds penalty reduction for non-payment of duty on manufacturing scrap.</h1> The appeal was dismissed by the Tribunal, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to reduce the penalty imposed on the appellant for non-payment of ... Penalty Issues: Appeal against reduction of penalty for non-payment of duty on scrap arising during manufacturing.Summary:The appeal was filed against the Commissioner (Appeals) order reducing the penalty imposed on the appellant for not paying duty on scrap arising during the manufacture of components of heat exchangers. The appellant argued that the duty amount involved was approximately Rs. 1,80,000, while they paid Rs. 500 crores annually, suggesting a sympathetic view should be taken.The Member (T) noted that the appellant's contentions did not assist their case. There is no provision of law that exempts an assessee from paying duty in proportion to the duty already paid. The Member expressed surprise at the appellant's argument that duty was nominal, especially considering their substantial annual duty payments. The duty was only paid after the department discovered the non-payment, leading the Member to believe there was no justification for reducing the penalty. The Member emphasized that paying duty after being caught by the department does not absolve the penalty.The Member dismissed the appeal, stating that the decisions of the Tribunal cited by the appellant did not support the argument that paying duty before notice issuance prevents penalty imposition. The Tribunal's decisions considered the bona fide actions of an assessee in rectifying short payments voluntarily, a scenario not applicable to the appellant who paid duty only after departmental intervention.