Contract price reduction clause for goods supplied over extended period-refund allowed despite no provisional assessment under s. 11B

The dominant issue was whether a refund claim could be denied on the ground that the price reduction was a post-sale reduction and that provisional assessment had not been sought. The tribunal held that where a price variation clause in the agreement specifically provided for reduction for goods supplied during an extended period, the assessable value at the time of clearance must be treated as the contractually reduced price, not a subsequent post-sale reduction; consequently, the refund was admissible. It further held that failure to seek provisional assessment does not extinguish the statutory right to claim refund under s. 11B of the Central Excise Act; accordingly, the impugned order was set aside and the appeal was allowed.

---

---

Issues involved:
Appeal against denial of refund of excise duty based on post-sale price reduction.

Summary:

Issue 1: Claim for refund of excise duty on reduced price
The appellant appealed against the Commissioner (Appeals) order rejecting its claim for refund of Rs. 2,08,695, contending that they paid excise duty on a higher amount than the price received from DOT. The Departmental Representative argued that duty is not payable on reduced price post-clearance. However, the agreement between the parties allowed for price fluctuation, specifically stating that any reduction in price beyond the original scheduled delivery date would be passed on to the purchaser.

Issue 2: Entitlement to refund and provisional assessment
The Tribunal disagreed with the Revenue's stance that the assessee's refund application should be denied for not seeking provisional assessment. It clarified that the lack of provisional assessment does not negate the right to claim refund under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal for refund of excise duty based on the agreed reduced price.

This judgment highlights the importance of contractual terms in determining excise duty liabilities and the entitlement to refunds, emphasizing that post-sale price reductions agreed upon by parties must be considered in duty calculations, irrespective of provisional assessment requests.

---