Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether duty deposited as a pre-deposit for hearing of an appeal could be taken back by re-credit after the appeal was allowed, without prior permission of the Assistant Commissioner, and whether a refund claim under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was necessary.
Analysis: The amount deposited during the pendency of the appeal was in the nature of a pre-deposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Once the appellate authority allowed the appeal, the assessee became entitled to restitution of the amount so deposited. The requirement of seeking prior permission before taking re-credit was held unwarranted, because the amount was not a duty refund claim in the ordinary sense but a return of a pre-deposit made only to pursue the appeal. Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was held inapplicable to such pre-deposit.
Conclusion: Re-credit of the pre-deposited amount could not be denied for want of prior permission, and the assessee was entitled to the amount upon success in appeal. The demand of prior refund procedure was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: Amounts deposited as pre-deposit for prosecuting an appeal are refundable or re-creditable on success in appeal without resort to Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 or prior administrative permission.