Generic DEPB classification for pig iron products upheld for exported piston rings where no specific entry existed.

Piston rings exported from pig iron were treated as eligible for DEPB classification under the generic entry "Pig Iron Products" because the schedule contained no specific listing for those goods and General Instruction No. 3 of Appendix 28A restricted generic coverage only where a specific rate existed for the item. The article notes that the goods were made from pig iron by a casting process and that the generic description was not shown to be limited to primary pig iron products or to exclude automotive parts. On that basis, the Revenue's objection failed and the DEPB benefit was upheld for the exported piston rings.

---

---

Issues: Whether piston rings exported by the respondent were classifiable under the DEPB Schedule as "Pig Iron Products" and entitled to DEPB benefit under the generic description.

Analysis: The DEPB schedule contained a generic entry for "Pig Iron Products", and General Instruction No. 3 of Appendix 28A barred coverage under a generic description only where a specific rate existed for the particular item. The respondent's goods were not specifically listed in the DEPB schedule, and the record showed that the piston rings were made from pig iron by a casting process. The description "Pig Iron Products" was not shown to be restricted to primary pig iron products or excluded merely because the goods were automotive parts.

Conclusion: The piston rings were entitled to classification under the generic DEPB entry for "Pig Iron Products", and the Revenue's objection failed.

Final Conclusion: The appeal was rejected and the benefit of DEPB was upheld for the exported piston rings.

Ratio Decidendi: Where a fiscal incentive schedule uses a generic description and no specific entry exists for the goods, the goods may be classified under that generic description unless the schedule expressly excludes them.

---