Non-appealable communication on provisional release of seized goods found not to be an adjudication order.

A communication permitting provisional release of seized goods on specified conditions was treated as a mere letter and not an adjudication order. Because it did not amount to an appealable order, the appellate forum lacked jurisdiction to entertain the challenge, and the appeals were held not maintainable.

---

---

Issues: Whether the impugned communication granting permission for provisional release of seized goods subject to conditions constituted an appealable order and whether the appeals were maintainable.

Analysis: The communication was only a letter conveying permission for release of goods on specified conditions and did not amount to an order of adjudication. Since it was not an appealable order, the appellate forum lacked jurisdiction to entertain the challenge.

Conclusion: The impugned communication was not an appealable order and the appeals were not maintainable.

---