Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the value of goods cleared under a brand name of another person, not entitled to the exemption, is to be included in the aggregate value of clearances for determining SSI exemption under Notification No. 175/86-C.E.
Analysis: The exemption notification treated only those clearances of specified goods which actually obtained the benefit of full exemption or concessional rate under the relevant clauses as countable for computing the first clearances. Goods affixed with the brand name of an ineligible person were outside the exemption itself and therefore could not be treated as clearances falling within those clauses for aggregation. The precedent relied on by the Revenue was distinguished on facts because it concerned duty-paid clearances after exhaustion of the exemption limit for another product, whereas the present case involved goods ineligible for exemption by reason of brand name.
Conclusion: The value of branded goods cleared on payment of duty was not includible in the aggregate value of clearances for the purpose of the exemption.