Appeal maintainability under Central Excise law extends to administrative orders, not just adjudicatory decisions, under the wider appellate wording.

Section 35 of the Central Excise Act was interpreted to allow an appeal to the Commissioner (Appeals) against any decision or order passed by a Central Excise officer below the rank of Commissioner, and not only against adjudicatory orders. By contrasting this wider language with Section 35B, which refers to orders of an adjudicating authority, the text states that even administrative decisions or orders, whether made in an executive or quasi-judicial capacity, fall within the appellate remedy. The departmental objection to maintainability was rejected, so the appeal was treated as maintainable and then dismissed.

---

---

Issues: Whether an administrative decision or order passed by a Central Excise officer could be appealed against before the Commissioner (Appeals) under Section 35 of the Central Excise Act.

Analysis: Section 35 permits an appeal to the Commissioner (Appeals) by any person aggrieved by any decision or order passed under the Act by a Central Excise officer lower in rank than a Commissioner, and does not confine the remedy to adjudicatory orders alone. By contrast, Section 35B uses language referring to orders passed by an adjudicating authority. Reading the provisions together, the wider wording of Section 35 was held to cover even administrative decisions or orders of a Central Excise officer, whether acting in an executive or quasi-judicial capacity.

Conclusion: The departmental objection to the maintainability of the appeal was rejected, and the appeal was dismissed.

---