CEGAT in Mumbai dismisses applications due to delay under Central Excise Act, 1944 The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai dismissed applications for condoning a four-year delay in filing under section 129D(1) of the Act, citing no ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
CEGAT in Mumbai dismisses applications due to delay under Central Excise Act, 1944
The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai dismissed applications for condoning a four-year delay in filing under section 129D(1) of the Act, citing no provision for condonation of delay under section 35E(4) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The applications and subsequent appeals were dismissed as barred by limitation.
The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai dismissed applications for condoning a four-year delay in filing under section 129D(1) of the Act. The Tribunal cited a decision stating no provision for condonation of delay under section 35E(4) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The applications were dismissed, and appeals were also dismissed as barred by limitation.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.