Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the remuneration received by a karta as managing director of a company floated and financed with joint family funds was assessable as the income of the Hindu undivided family or as his personal income.
Analysis: The managing directorship was found to be inseparably connected with the promotion of the company, the acquisition of the business, and the financing of the concern from joint family assets. The shares qualifying the appointment were acquired with family funds, the dividends were enjoyed by the family, and the remuneration had consistently been treated in the family accounts as family income. The personal element in the office did not displace the legal consequence that the office and its remuneration were obtained as part of a scheme founded on joint family resources and benefit.
Conclusion: The remuneration was assessable in the hands of the Hindu undivided family and not as the karta's personal income.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded, and the assessment of the managing director's remuneration was upheld as income of the Hindu undivided family.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a karta obtains an office and the resulting remuneration through the use of joint family funds and in furtherance of a family venture, the remuneration is income of the Hindu undivided family.