Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the third proviso to section 12B(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act protected the administrator's sale of shares and securities under a will, and whether the expression "distribution of capital assets" meant distribution in specie or distribution of sale proceeds.
Analysis: Section 12B taxed profits or gains arising from the sale, exchange or transfer of a capital asset, while sub-section (3) contemplated cases where capital assets became the assessee's property by succession, inheritance, devolution or under the circumstances mentioned in the third proviso. Read with that scheme, the proviso was meant to exclude from the section transfers by way of distribution of capital assets in specie in the specified situations. The expression "capital assets" could not be equated with their sale proceeds, and a sale followed by distribution of proceeds was materially different from a distribution of the assets themselves. Construing the proviso as including sale proceeds would create an anomaly and would not fit the structure of the section.
Conclusion: The third proviso did not cover the administrator's sale of the shares and securities, and "distribution of capital assets" meant distribution in specie and not distribution of sale proceeds.