Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee's accumulated income, withdrawn from Bhavnagar and credited in Bombay through a cheque and benami accounts, was "brought into or received in the taxable territories" within the meaning of section 4(1)(b)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1922.
Analysis: The income had accrued and been received outside the taxable territories before the previous year, but the assessee, while in Bombay, drew a cheque on the Bhavnagar account, caused it to be credited in Bombay, and thereby used the money for an advance to the Bombay concern. The statutory expression "brought into or received in the taxable territories" was held to be satisfied on these facts. The receipt need not be the first receipt in the context of section 4(1)(b)(iii), and an indirect method of transfer does not prevent the transaction from amounting to receipt by the assessee himself.
Conclusion: The amount was chargeable to tax as income brought into or received in the taxable territories by the assessee under section 4(1)(b)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1922, and the question was answered in the affirmative.
Ratio Decidendi: For section 4(1)(b)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1922, income earlier accrued and received outside the taxable territories is taxable when, in substance, it is brought into or received in the taxable territories by the assessee, even through an indirect banking or benami mechanism.