TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the triplicate copy of Bill of Entry and the duplicate copy of Bill of Entry generated on the EDI system are documents "issued" for the purpose of Rule 57G(5) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, so that the six-month limitation for taking Modvat credit applies to credit of CVD paid on imported inputs.
Analysis: The relevant scheme under Sections 46 and 47 of the Customs Act shows that an importer presents the Bill of Entry for home consumption, the proper officer assesses duty, and the assessed Bill of Entry is returned to the importer for payment of duty and clearance of the goods. The document retained by the importer after assessment and payment is the duty-paying document contemplated by Rule 57G(3). Reading Rule 57G(5) with the Customs provisions, the word "issue" in the time-bar provision must be understood in the sense of return of the assessed Bill of Entry by the proper officer. A construction treating the Bill of Entry as not issued would defeat the statutory scheme and make the limitation provision inapplicable to a category of documents expressly covered by Rule 57G(3).
Conclusion: The six-month limitation under Rule 57G(5) applies to Modvat credit taken on the basis of the triplicate copy of Bill of Entry and the duplicate copy of Bill of Entry generated on the EDI system. The referred question is answered in the affirmative, against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
