Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether parts of machinery and coated abrasive/aloxide paper belt metalite were eligible for Modvat credit as inputs under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, or were excluded as machinery-related items falling within the exclusion clause.
Analysis: The deciding principle applied was that the exclusion clause in Rule 57A covers full and complete assemblages such as machine, machinery, apparatus, appliance, equipment, plant and tool, and not mere parts of such units. On that footing, items used as parts of machinery, or used with the machine for finishing and smoothing work, do not lose eligibility merely because they are connected with the machinery. The reasoning followed the Larger Bench view that the relevant expressions in the exclusion clause denote self-contained and complete units, and that a part of a machine is not an appliance or other excluded item.
Conclusion: The goods in question were held eligible for Modvat credit as inputs, and the appeals were disposed of in accordance with that view.