Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, while granting bail in a bailable offence, the Magistrate can impose a condition requiring surrender of passport and a further condition restraining travel outside India without prior permission of the Court.
Analysis: The statutory scheme under Section 436 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 confers an absolute right to bail in bailable offences, subject only to the manner of furnishing bail and the limited proviso relating to indigent accused. The power to impose conditions is found in the provisions dealing with non-bailable offences and special powers of the High Court or Court of Session, not in Section 436. The bond under Section 441 is directed to securing attendance, and a passport-surrender condition or a restraint on foreign is not a term as to bail in a bailable offence. If there is apprehension of absconding, recourse lies to other lawful measures, including steps concerning the passport under the appropriate law.
Conclusion: The condition requiring deposit of the passport and the condition prohibiting travel outside India without permission were without jurisdiction and liable to be set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: In a bailable offence, the accused has an absolute right to be released on bail on offering bail, and the Magistrate cannot impose conditions that are not terms necessary for securing attendance, such as surrender of passport or prior permission for foreign .