Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for valuation of excisable goods sold partly to a related subsidiary and partly to independent buyers, the price charged to independent buyers at the factory gate could form the basis of assessable value under section 4(1)(a) of the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944.
Analysis: The sales to unrelated buyers constituted a substantial part of the total clearances during the relevant periods. The goods were sold to the related subsidiary at the same price at which they were sold to other buyers, and no special consideration or preferential treatment in pricing was shown. In these circumstances, the price charged to independent buyers represented the proper basis for determining value under the excise valuation provision.
Conclusion: The assessable value was rightly determined on the basis of the price charged to independent buyers, and the challenge to the duty demand failed.
Final Conclusion: The appeals were rejected and the valuation adopted by the authorities below was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Where excisable goods are sold at the same factory-gate price to a related person and to substantial numbers of independent buyers, the price to independent buyers may be taken as the assessable value in the absence of any special favour or extra-commercial consideration.