Incomplete Tribunal order where independent appeal grounds were left undecided cannot amount to full disposal of the appeal.

A Tribunal order is incomplete if it fails to address all independent grounds raised in the appeal memorandum. Where separate challenges were pleaded on fuel oil in engine room tanks, Special Additional Duty, and duty on foodstuff, the omission of some grounds meant the appeal had not been disposed of in its entirety. The legal consequence is that the order cannot be treated as complete or fully determinative of the appeal. The Gujarat High Court therefore held that the Tribunal was not justified in leaving unresolved grounds undecided, and the matter could not stand as a complete appellate adjudication.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Tribunal's order could be treated as complete when it had not dealt with all the grounds of appeal raised before it.

Analysis: The appeal memorandum showed that, besides the dispute on fuel oil in engine room tanks, the appellant had raised separate grounds on the levy of Special Additional Duty and on duty on foodstuff. The order under challenge dealt only with some issues and omitted independent grounds that required determination. Such omission meant that the appeal before the Tribunal had not been disposed of in its entirety, and the order could not be regarded as complete.

Conclusion: The issue was answered in the negative. The Tribunal was not justified in failing to deal with all the grounds of appeal, and its order was incomplete.

---