High Court denies Union of India's excise duty refund application from bank guarantee. Bank guarantee not considered payment. The High Court rejected the Union of India's application for a refund of excise duty encashed from a bank guarantee under Section 35H(1) of the Central ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
High Court denies Union of India's excise duty refund application from bank guarantee. Bank guarantee not considered payment.
The High Court rejected the Union of India's application for a refund of excise duty encashed from a bank guarantee under Section 35H(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The court ruled that a bank guarantee does not constitute payment of excise duty and is not eligible for a refund under Section 11B. The department was instructed to repay the encashed amount to the assessee following the precedent set in the Oswal Agro Mills case by the Apex Court.
The High Court rejected the application under Section 35H(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 by the Union of India regarding the refund of excise duty encashed from a bank guarantee. The court held that the bank guarantee is not equivalent to payment of excise duty and therefore does not qualify for a refund under Section 11B. The department was directed to repay the encashed amount to the assessee based on the decision of the Apex Court in the Oswal Agro Mills case.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.