TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court overturns Tribunal's deposit requirement, orders fresh hearing for petitioner, citing failure to address appeal issues and financial hardship.</h1> <h3>NORTHERN DOORS (P) LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, KANPUR</h3> The High Court set aside the Central Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal's order requiring a deposit for entertaining the appeal, citing failure to ... Stay/Dispensation of pre-deposit Issues involved: Challenge to order of Central Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal requiring deposit for entertaining appeal.Summary:The petitioner challenged the order of the Central Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi, which required a deposit of Rs. 2,00,000 for entertaining the appeal. The petitioner argued that the Tribunal misinterpreted the orders regarding the supply of doors and failed to consider the principles established by the High Court in a previous case. The High Court held that the Tribunal did not address the issues involved in the appeal and focused on financial hardship, which was deemed unwarranted. Consequently, the High Court set aside the Tribunal's order and directed a fresh decision with a hearing for the petitioner.The High Court emphasized that the Tribunal did not consider the principles laid down by the High Court in a previous case, leading to the unsustainability of the order. The Court directed the Tribunal to reexamine the application after providing the petitioner with a hearing, in line with the observations made. The writ petition was allowed, and the Tribunal was instructed to promptly decide on the application.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
