TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court rules on assessable value of goods, excludes secondary packing, and dismisses appeals.</h1> <h3>COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., VADODARA Versus MARIGOLD PAINTS PVT. LTD.</h3> The Supreme Court dismissed Civil Appeal No. 5948 of 1999 and Civil Appeal No. 4934 of 1999 against the Customs, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate ... Valuation (Central Excise) - Packing - whether the value of secondary packing i.e., cardboard box, used to pack Paint tins, is to be included in the assessable value of the goods, namely, paints - Held that:- case is fully covered by the principles laid down in the cases of Geep Industrial Syndicate Ltd. v. Union of India reported in [1986 (4) TMI 75 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] and C.C.E. v. Ponds India Ltd. reported in [1989 (10) TMI 54 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA]. In this view of the matter we see no reason to interfere with the impugned Orders - Decided against Revenue. The Supreme Court dismissed Civil Appeal No. 5948 of 1999 and Civil Appeal No. 4934 of 1999 against the Customs, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal's judgments. The value of secondary packing, like cardboard boxes, used for packing paints is not to be included in the assessable value of the goods. The Court referred to previous cases for this decision. The Court did not allow the question of deductibility of trade discount as it was not raised in the appeals. The Appeals were dismissed with no order as to costs.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
