Cancellation of regular bail requires supervening grounds, not a coordinate bench's reassessment of the original bail merits.

Regular bail may be cancelled only on recognised post-release grounds, including misuse of liberty, breach of bail conditions, statutory ineligibility, or procurement through fraud or misrepresentation. Reassessment of whether the original bail order was unjustified, illegal, or perverse concerns setting it aside by a superior court and cannot be undertaken by a coordinate Single Judge as a virtual review. Where trial had commenced and no recognised cancellation ground existed, the cancellation orders were legally unsustainable and the appellants' bail remained valid.

---

---

Issues: Whether regular bail could be cancelled by a coordinate Single Judge on a reassessment of merits in the absence of misuse of liberty, breach of bail conditions, fraud, misrepresentation, or other supervening circumstances.

Analysis: The parameters governing grant of bail and cancellation of bail are distinct. Cancellation requires post-release misuse of liberty, breach of conditions, statutory ineligibility, or procurement of bail through fraud or misrepresentation. A finding that an earlier bail order was unjustified, illegal, or perverse concerns its setting aside by a superior court and cannot be achieved through a coordinate bench virtually reviewing the earlier order. As the charge had been framed, trial had commenced, and no recognised ground for cancellation was established, the cancellation orders were legally unsustainable.

Conclusion: The cancellation of the appellants' bail was invalid; their bail could not be cancelled on the stated grounds.

---