Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the refund application dated 9-5-75 was a proper application under Rule 11 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 so as to entitle the appellant to refund from 10-5-74 onwards, and whether the refund claim should be verified for the period 10-5-74 to 31-7-75.
Analysis: The application dated 9-5-75 expressly sought refund and enclosed a statement of purchases, showing that it was a valid refund application within Rule 11. The Tribunal's view that no proper application had been made until 21-11-75 was erroneous. Since the claim was maintainable from the earlier date, the refund period had to be considered from 10-5-74, subject to verification by the Collector on the records and subject to entitlement under the notification.
Conclusion: The application dated 9-5-75 was held to be a proper refund application, and the claim was directed to be verified for the period from 10-5-74 to 31-7-75. The finding denying refund for the earlier period was set aside, and the decision was in favour of the assessee.