1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Reassessment beyond four years u/s18 requires prior recorded satisfaction by Commissioner; notice issued late quashed</h1> Whether s.18 of the Assam General Sales Tax Act permits reassessment beyond four years without prior recorded satisfaction of the Commissioner: court held ... - Issues: Whether re-assessment under Section 18 of the Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993 beyond four years from the end of the relevant year is permissible without prior recording of reasons and satisfaction by the Commissioner.Analysis: Section 18 prescribes two limitation periods: eight years where concealment or incorrect particulars are alleged and four years in other cases, subject to the proviso that issuance of a notice under clause (a) after four years requires the Commissioner to be satisfied and to record reasons before issuance. The statutory text treats recording of reasons and the Commissioner's prior satisfaction as a pre-condition to extending the limitation beyond four years. Subsequent affirmation by the Commissioner after issuance of the notice does not fulfil the statutory prerequisite where no reasons were recorded prior to issuing the notice. The decision relied upon by the Revenue concerned the effect of irregularities in conducting proceedings where the order remained within limitation; that reasoning is distinguishable where the notice itself is time-barred under the statutory scheme.Conclusion: Re-assessment beyond four years is not valid unless the Commissioner has, before issuance of the notice, recorded reasons and been satisfied that extended limitation applies; absent such prior recording and satisfaction, the re-assessment notice and proceedings are quashed.Ratio Decidendi: Where a statute conditions an extended limitation for reassessment on prior recording of reasons and satisfaction by the Commissioner, failure to record such reasons before issuing the notice renders a reassessment issued after four years invalid and cannot be cured by subsequent approval.