Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether credit for TDS not claimed in the return but reflected in audited accounts and Form 26AS can be allowed after verification and subject to examination by the Assessing Officer.
Analysis: The issue was examined on the basis that the TDS entries appeared in the audited financial statements under balances with government authorities and in Form 26AS while the credit was inadvertently not claimed in the filed return. The appellate authority applied judicial principles that technical objections should not defeat a lawful substantive right where a meritorious claim exists. The appellate authority directed that the Assessing Officer is to verify the genuineness of the TDS claim, examine whether the corresponding income has been disclosed in the return, and give the assessee adequate opportunity of being heard, with the assessee required to cooperate in the verification process. The appellate order was affirmed on the ground that the claim warranted examination and could not be denied on purely technical grounds.
Conclusion: Credit for TDS not claimed in the return but reflected in audited accounts and Form 26AS is to be examined and allowed if verified; the Assessing Officer is directed to verify the claim and give opportunity of hearing, and the appellate order directing such verification is affirmed in favour of the assessee.