Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the appellate order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) without affording the Assessing Officer an opportunity of hearing under section 250(2) is vitiated and whether the matter should be remitted for de novo adjudication after hearing the Assessing Officer.
Analysis: Section 250(2) grants the right to be heard at the hearing of the appeal to both the appellant and the Assessing Officer. The statutory scheme for appeals under section 248 concerns determination of tax deductible under section 195 and related obligations; where the Commissioner (Appeals) proceeds without providing the Assessing Officer the hearing guaranteed by section 250(2), the procedural right conferred on the Assessing Officer is not complied with. Given the absence of such opportunity in the present proceedings, and because the question of tax withholding liability arising from foreign remittances falls within the purview of the Assessing Officer's jurisdictional functions, the appropriate remedy is to remit the matter for fresh adjudication so that the Assessing Officer may be afforded a reasonable opportunity to be heard and the appeal decided afresh on merits.
Conclusion: The appeal is allowed to the extent that the matter is remitted to the Commissioner (Appeals) for de novo adjudication after giving a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the Assessing Officer; this result is in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where section 250(2) confers a right to be heard to the Assessing Officer at the appellate hearing, failure to afford that right vitiates the appellate proceedings and requires remand for fresh adjudication after hearing the Assessing Officer.