Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the reassessment notice and the order under Section 148A(d) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for assessment year 2013-14 were liable to be interfered with on the ground of lack of jurisdiction and limitation, and whether interim protection was warranted pending adjudication.
Analysis: The writ petition challenged the reassessment initiation on the ground that the notice under Section 148 and the consequential order under Section 148A(d) were issued beyond the permissible period, with reference to Section 149(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court noted that the initiation of reassessment proceedings was prima facie beyond six years and that the petitioner had raised a substantial jurisdictional issue requiring affidavits and final hearing. On that basis, the Court found a prima facie case for interim protection.
Outcome: The respondents were directed to file affidavits and, in the meantime, further proceedings on the impugned order were stayed till disposal of the writ petition.