TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petition for bail or default bail should be entertained when an application for the same relief was already pending before the Special Court.
Analysis: The petition was not examined on merits because a similar application seeking bail or default bail was already pending before the competent Special Court. In those circumstances, entertaining parallel proceedings for the same relief was considered inappropriate, and the petitioner was relegated to pursue the remedy before the Special Court.
Conclusion: The petition was not entertained and the petitioner was directed to pursue the pending application before the Special Court.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
