Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal's earlier order required rectification under section 254(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and whether late deposit of employees' contribution to provident fund and ESI was liable to be disallowed while processing the return.
Analysis: The Bench accepted the Revenue's miscellaneous application in line with the lead order passed in connected matters, holding that there was a mistake apparent from the record warranting rectification. It was further noted that the disallowance of employees' contribution deposited beyond the due date under the relevant welfare enactments could be made while processing the return under section 143(1).
Conclusion: The rectification application was allowed and the impugned issue was decided against the assessee, with a direction to recompute income by disallowing the late deposited employees' contribution to PF/ESI.