TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appeal Dismissed After 808-Day Delay In Reverse Charge Business Support Tax Dispute; No Condonation For Late Filing</h1> SC refused to condone a delay of 808 days in filing an appeal concerning liability under reverse charge mechanism for alleged Business Support Services. ... Condonation of delay of 808 days in filing appeal - Business Support services - Reverse charge mechanism - HELD THAT:- In the absence of a sufficient explanation, it is declined to condone the delay. The appeal is accordingly dismissed on the ground of delay. The Supreme Court considered an appeal filed with a delay of 808 days. The Court held that, 'In the absence of a sufficient explanation, we decline to condone the delay.' Applying the law of limitation, the Court refused to exercise its discretion under limitation principles to excuse the substantial delay, finding no adequate or satisfactory cause shown by the appellant. Consequently, the appeal was 'dismissed on the ground of delay.' The dismissal was purely on the issue of limitation and not on the merits. The Court expressly clarified that, 'the question of law is kept open to be addressed and decided in appropriate proceedings in the future,' preserving all substantive legal issues for later adjudication.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
