Low tax effect threshold bars departmental appeal, so the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue challenge without examining merits.

A departmental appeal before the ITAT was dismissed as not maintainable because the tax effect was stated to be only Rs. 30,000/-, well below the monetary limit prescribed in CBDT Circular No. 17/2019 dated 08/08/2019. The Tribunal applied the circular's threshold for filing appeals and declined to examine the merits of the addition. The ruling confirms that where the tax effect falls below the prescribed limit, the Revenue's appeal is liable to be rejected at the threshold, leaving the substantive controversy undecided.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Revenue's appeal was liable to be dismissed for having a tax effect below the monetary limit prescribed by the CBDT circular.

Analysis: The appeal was filed by the Revenue in respect of an assessment year dispute involving a tax effect stated to be only Rs. 30,000/-. The monetary limit for filing appeals before the Tribunal under CBDT Circular No. 17/2019 dated 08/08/2019 was far higher than the tax effect involved. The appeal was, therefore, not maintainable on the ground of low tax effect, and the merits of the addition were not examined.

Conclusion: The Revenue's appeal was not maintainable and was dismissed for low tax effect.

Final Conclusion: The decision gives effect to the CBDT's monetary threshold for departmental appeals and leaves the substantive controversy undecided.

Ratio Decidendi: A departmental appeal falling below the prescribed monetary limit is liable to be dismissed without examination on merits.

---