We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic • Quick overview summary answering your query with references• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced • Includes everything in Basic • Detailed report covering: - Overview Summary - Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars] - Relevant Case Laws - Tariff / Classification / HSN - Expert views from TaxTMI - Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
<h1>Arbitrator appointed to decide assignment dispute under Share Purchase Agreement dated 22.12.2004; arbitration to proceed under Arbitration Rules, 2012</h1> HC allowed the petition and appointed an arbitrator to decide disputes arising under the share purchase agreement dated 22.12.2004, including the ... Appointment of an Arbitrator to resolve the dispute which has arisen out of the share purchase agreement - Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - assignment of right under the share purchase agreement - HELD THAT:- There is no dispute that the petitioner and the respondent have entered into a share purchase agreement at Annexure-A dated 22.12.2004. It is also not in dispute that the said agreement contains an arbitration clause for the resolution of the dispute. The contention of the respondent is that the petitioner has already assigned his right under the share purchase agreement at Annexure-A in favour of O. Arumugasamy. This question requires to be adjudicated by the arbitrator. In the circumstances, it is just and proper to appoint an Arbitrator to resolve the dispute. Hon’ble Sri. Justice B. Padmaraj, a Former Judge of this Court, is requested to enter upon the reference and arbitrate over the dispute and conduct arbitration proceedings at Arbitration Center in terms of the Arbitration Center – Karnataka (Domestic and International) Rules, 2012. Petition allowed. Petitioner filed a civil miscellaneous petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an arbitrator under a share purchase agreement dated 22.12.2004, which 'contains an arbitration clause for the resolution of the dispute.' Petitioner alleges respondent failed to perform obligations under the agreement after receipt of consideration; respondent contends petitioner had assigned his rights under the agreement to a third party, thus negating entitlement to appoint an arbitrator. Court found existence of the agreement and its arbitration clause undisputed and held that the question whether rights were assigned 'requires to be adjudicated by the arbitrator.' Petition allowed; an arbitrator is appointed to resolve the dispute and to conduct proceedings at the Arbitration Center in terms of the Arbitration Center - Karnataka (Domestic and International) Rules, 2012. No costs.
TaxTMI 
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
