Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order passed under Section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was liable to be set aside for breach of natural justice, and whether the matter should be remanded for fresh assessment despite the availability of an appellate remedy.
Analysis: The assessment order was challenged on the ground that no show cause notice had been issued and no opportunity had been given to file a reply. That factual assertion was not denied. In the circumstances, the Court treated the omission as a patent violation of the principles of natural justice and held that the existence of an alternative remedy would not preclude interference in such exceptional facts. The impugned order was therefore set aside and the matter was sent back for fresh adjudication after considering the petitioner's reply and after giving an opportunity of hearing.
Conclusion: The assessment order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the assessing officer for fresh assessment in accordance with law after affording the petitioner an opportunity to reply and be heard.