Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Re-listing to 06.08.2025; state to decide if inkjet and toner cartridges fall under Entry 4 Part B or Schedule V</h1> <h3>M/s Savex Technologies Private Limited Versus The State of Bihar</h3> HC directed re-listing of the tax dispute to 06.08.2025 and directed the State to peruse whether inkjet cartridges and toner cartridges fall under entry 4 ... Whether 'inkjet cartridges' and 'tonor cartridges' are covered by entry 4 of Part B of the Second Schedule to the Assam Value Added Tax Act, 2003, which lists items attracting lesser rate of tax or covered by residue entry in Schedule V providing higher rate of tax? - the State is requested to peruse the same and make her statement whether the matter is covered or not? - HELD THAT:- Re-list this matter on 06.08.2025. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the matter 'could be disposed of in terms of the judgment' referred in Hewlett Packard India Sales Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Assam [(2012) 56 VST 472 : 2012 SCC OnLine Gau 903], Canon India Private Limited v. State of T.N. [2013 SCC OnLine Mad 2038 : (2014) 305 ELT 255], and Wep Peripherals Ltd. Throu Authorised Secy. v. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes U.P. Lucknow [2018 SCC OnLine All 5572]. The State was directed to peruse those authorities and 'make her statement whether the matter is covered or not.' Matter was re-listed for further hearing on 06.08.2025. Key procedural posture: reliance on precedent for disposal, invitation to State to concede applicability, and adjournment for determination of whether cited precedents govern the case.