Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2019 (8) TMI 1933 - SC - Indian Laws

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        High Court disciplinary control over judicial officers includes inquiry and suspension despite parallel sexual harassment proceedings. Article 235 gives the High Court complete disciplinary control over subordinate judicial officers, including the power to initiate disciplinary ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          High Court disciplinary control over judicial officers includes inquiry and suspension despite parallel sexual harassment proceedings.

                          Article 235 gives the High Court complete disciplinary control over subordinate judicial officers, including the power to initiate disciplinary proceedings and suspend an officer pending inquiry; the Governor's role arises only at the stage of dismissal, removal or reduction in rank. The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Act, 2013 does not displace that constitutional control, so disciplinary action and suspension may proceed alongside the statutory complaint mechanism. Non-supply of a preliminary inquiry report that only recommended further inquiry did not vitiate proceedings where it was not the final report, was not relied on in the charge memo, and no prejudice was shown.




                          Issues: (i) Whether the High Court was the competent disciplinary authority to initiate disciplinary proceedings against a judicial officer and place him under suspension. (ii) Whether the Full Court's decision to initiate inquiry and suspend the petitioner was beyond jurisdiction in view of the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013. (iii) Whether non-supply of the preliminary inquiry report dated 05.11.2016 vitiated the proceedings.

                          Issue (i): Whether the High Court was the competent disciplinary authority to initiate disciplinary proceedings against a judicial officer and place him under suspension.

                          Analysis: Article 235 vests complete disciplinary control over the subordinate judiciary in the High Court. That control includes the power to initiate disciplinary proceedings, hold inquiries, and suspend a judicial officer pending inquiry. The Governor's role is attracted only at the stage of dismissal, removal, or reduction in rank, not at the stage of initiation or suspension. The authorities relied upon by the petitioner did not dilute this settled position.

                          Conclusion: The High Court was competent to initiate disciplinary proceedings and to suspend the petitioner.

                          Issue (ii): Whether the Full Court's decision to initiate inquiry and suspend the petitioner was beyond jurisdiction in view of the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013.

                          Analysis: The Act of 2013 provides a mechanism for complaint, inquiry, and redressal of sexual harassment at the workplace, but it does not displace the High Court's constitutional disciplinary control over judicial officers under Article 235. The Act and the service disciplinary process can operate together. The Full Court was therefore not barred from initiating disciplinary action and placing the petitioner under suspension while the complaint was processed under the statutory mechanism.

                          Conclusion: The Full Court's action was not beyond jurisdiction.

                          Issue (iii): Whether non-supply of the preliminary inquiry report dated 05.11.2016 vitiated the proceedings.

                          Analysis: The report dated 05.11.2016 was only a preliminary report expressing an opinion that a disciplinary inquiry be held. It was not the final inquiry report contemplated by Section 13 of the Act of 2013, nor did it contain proved findings against the petitioner. The later inquiry report was supplied to the petitioner. Since the charge memo did not rely on the preliminary report and no prejudice was shown, non-supply of that report did not vitiate the proceedings.

                          Conclusion: Non-supply of the preliminary inquiry report did not vitiate the proceedings.

                          Final Conclusion: The writ petition failed on all the issues that were substantively examined, and the disciplinary process initiated by the High Court was upheld, leaving the petitioner free to pursue all remaining contentions in the pending inquiry.

                          Ratio Decidendi: The High Court's disciplinary control under Article 235 over subordinate judicial officers includes the power to initiate inquiry and suspend pending proceedings, and a preliminary complaint report expressing only a prima facie opinion need not be supplied where no prejudice is shown.


                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found