Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
The Calcutta High Court, in WPA No.18828 of 2022, addressed a challenge to the impugned order dated 20th July 2022 under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, concerning assessment year 2017-18. The petitioner contended that the reassessment was without jurisdiction and violated Section 149(1)(a), which prohibits reopening assessments beyond three years if escaped income does not exceed Rs. 50 lakhs. The assessing officer's notice under Section 148A(b) recorded escaped income of Rs. 22,66,575/-, below the Rs. 50 lakhs threshold. The respondent failed to justify the reassessment. The Court held that reopening was impermissible and accordingly quashed the reassessment proceedings, disposing of the petition.