Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the order passed under Section 148A(d) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the consequential notice issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 were sustainable when the assessee was not granted an opportunity of hearing.
Analysis: The order under Section 148A(d) was assailed on the ground of absence of hearing. The Revenue fairly accepted that opportunity of hearing had not been afforded. In view of the admitted procedural lapse, the order could not be sustained, and the consequential notice issued under Section 148 also fell with it. The appropriate course was to set aside the action and remit the matter for fresh consideration after granting hearing.
Conclusion: The impugned order under Section 148A(d) and the consequential notice under Section 148 were quashed, and the matter was remitted to the authority to decide afresh after giving the petitioner an opportunity of hearing.