Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the addition relating to CST and VAT payments required reconsideration in the light of DCB reports and the assessee's plea that no demand existed for the relevant period.
Analysis: The assessee produced DCB reports and claimed that the relevant challans were not available as the accountant had absconded. The Tribunal found that the effect of the DCB reports and the alleged non-existence of outstanding demand could not be accepted or rejected without factual verification from the concerned departments. It therefore considered it appropriate to direct the Assessing Officer to examine the material and verify whether any demand existed for the relevant period and whether the payments towards CST and VAT stood properly made.
Conclusion: The issue was remitted to the Assessing Officer for fresh factual verification and reconsideration, with directions to take the DCB reports into account.