Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether reassessment initiated on the same material already examined in the original assessment was valid, or whether it amounted to a change of opinion and was bad in law.
Analysis: The original assessment had been completed under section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 after examination of the relevant issue. The reopening under sections 147 and 148 was founded on no material alien to the record and was based on the very same matter already considered earlier. In such circumstances, the reassessment proceedings were treated as a mere change of opinion.
Conclusion: The reopening was held to be bad in law, and the revenue's challenge failed.