TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Challenging PMLA Attachment: Legal Battle Over Property Seizure Scope and Procedural Fairness Under Scrutiny</h1> <h3>M/s Prakash Industries Ltd. & Anr & M/s. Hi-Tech Mercantile India Pvt. Ltd & Ors. Versus Directorate of Enforcement</h3> M/s Prakash Industries Ltd. & Anr & M/s. Hi-Tech Mercantile India Pvt. Ltd & Ors. Versus Directorate of Enforcement - TMI The Delhi High Court, presided by Hon'ble Ms. Justice Rekha Palli, addressed petitions challenging Provisional Attachment Orders nos. 8337-8340/2021 dated 01.12.2021 and proceedings under Section 5 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The petitioners contended that the attachment was flawed as the respondent's own assessment limited the proceeds of crime to approximately Rs. 951 crore, whereas the petitioner incurred over Rs. 680 crore for operation and development of the coal mine and was obligated to pay Rs. 249 crore as compensation per the Supreme Court's order in Manohar Lal Sharma v. Principal Secretary, (2014) 9 SCC 516. They further argued that certain attached properties were acquired prior to the alleged offence and thus were not liable for attachment. The Court issued notice, granted the respondents three weeks to file a counter affidavit, and scheduled further proceedings for 23.02.2022. The applications for exemption were allowed, and the interim applications disposed of.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
