Exemption notifications must expressly cover each cess claimed; excise duty relief does not automatically extend to education cesses.

Refund of Education Cess and Secondary and Higher Education Cess paid with excise duty was held not admissible where the exemption notification covered only basic excise duty. The text states that an exemption must expressly extend to the specific duty or cess claimed for refund; relief for excise duty does not automatically apply to separately imposed cesses created under distinct Finance Act provisions. The earlier contrary view was treated as per incuriam for not considering binding larger-bench precedents, and the lower authority's order was sustained with the appeals dismissed.

---

---

Issues: Whether refund of Education Cess and Secondary and Higher Education Cess paid along with excise duty under Notification No. 56/2002-CE dated 14.11.2002 was admissible.

Analysis: The issue was treated as covered by the earlier decision of the Bench following the binding rulings holding that an exemption notification must specifically cover the duty or cess sought to be refunded. It was held that exemption granted for excise duty does not automatically extend to education cess or secondary and higher education cess, which are additional levies created under separate Finance Act provisions. The earlier contrary view was treated as per incuriam because it did not consider the binding larger-bench precedents.

Conclusion: The refund claim was not admissible and the appeals were dismissed.

Final Conclusion: The lower authority's order was sustained and the exemption notification was held not to cover the cess component automatically.

Ratio Decidendi: An exemption notification must expressly cover the specific duty or cess claimed; exemption from basic excise duty does not, by itself, extend to separately imposed cesses or additional duties.

---