Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether receipts from background screening and investigation services were taxable as royalty or fees for technical services under the India-UK DTAA.
Analysis: The issue was treated as covered by earlier decisions on the same activity and the jurisdictional High Court had already held that background checks and verification of testimonials do not amount to use of technical knowledge, experience or skill. The services consisted of collection and validation of factual information and delivery of screening reports for internal use by clients. Such reports did not amount to use of copyright, access to a database, or imparting of commercial experience, and the services did not make available technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how or processes to the client.
Conclusion: The receipts were not taxable as royalty or fees for technical services, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The assessment addition based on characterization of the screening receipts as royalty or fees for technical services could not be sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Background verification and screening services that only generate factual reports for client use do not constitute royalty or fees for technical services unless they involve use of copyright, access to a database, or make available technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how or processes.