Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a provisional assessment under Rule 9B read with Rule 173J of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 remains provisional for all purposes, so that limitation for a refund claim under Rule 11 begins only from the date of finalisation of the assessment, even if the refund claim is based on a ground different from the one that led to provisional assessment.
Analysis: The assessment was held to be either provisional or final as a whole. If the assessment is provisional, it retains that character for every purpose and cannot be treated as final for a matter not separately considered. The controlling factor is the ultimate character of the assessment order, and a provisional assessment is not confined to the particular ground on which it was initially made provisional. The Court followed the earlier view that provisional assessment is provisional for all purposes, including refund claims.
Conclusion: The question was answered in the affirmative in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. Limitation for the refund claim commenced from the date of finalisation of the provisional assessment.