TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Madras HC Overturns Tribunal Judgment, Cites Prior Cases T.C.A. No. 157/2017, 551/2013, 402/2013; No Costs Imposed.</h1> The Madras HC ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the Tribunal's judgment dated 02.01.2013. The court noted that the issues had been addressed ... Eligibility to balance 10% of additional depreciation under Section 32(1)(iia) - claim of carry forward to next AY - number of days of use - HELD THAT:- As the issue raised in the captioned appeals, is covered by the judgment of this Court rendered M/s. Shri T.P. Textiles Private Limited[2017 (3) TMI 739 - MADRAS HIGH COURT], M/s. Brakes India Limited [2017 (4) TMI 511 - MADRAS HIGH COURT] and M/s. Multivista Global Limited [2017 (4) TMI 411 - MADRAS HIGH COURT] as held that word 'new' which precedes 'machinery or plant' is indicative of the type of asset, on which, additional depreciation can be claimed. In our opinion, it does not, in any way, limit or restrict the claim for additional depreciation, to the previous year, in which, the said asset is installed and used. Accordingly, in our view, the Assessee cannot be prevented from claiming balance additional depreciation in the following year, thus decided in favour of assessee Accordingly, the appeals are allowed and the impugned judgment of the Tribunal is set aside. The Madras High Court, comprising THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMAR, rendered a judgment in favor of the appellant. The legal representatives for the appellant and the respondent were Mr. Venkatnarayanan for M/s. Subbaraya Aiyar and Mr. T. Ravi Kumar, Standing Counsel, respectively. The court recognized that the issues in the appeals were already addressed in prior judgments, specifically in T.C.A. No. 157 of 2017, T.C.A. No. 551 of 2013, and T.C.A. No. 402 of 2013. Consequently, the appeals were allowed, and the Tribunal's impugned judgment dated 02.01.2013 was set aside. The court ordered that there would be no costs associated with this judgment.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
