Fresh reconsideration required where later Supreme Court ratio governs the controversy and remand follows.

The appeal was disposed of after the parties accepted that the controversy had to be reconsidered in light of the Supreme Court's binding ratio. The earlier order was not finally examined on merits; instead, the matter was remitted to the competent authority for fresh decision in accordance with the later Supreme Court ruling. The operative effect is that the issue must now be decided afresh under the governing precedent.

---

---

Issues: Whether the matter should be remitted for fresh consideration in light of the Supreme Court's ruling.

Analysis: The appeal was considered in the context of the later Supreme Court decision governing the controversy. The parties accepted that the issue required reconsideration on the basis of that binding ratio, and the earlier order under challenge was not finally affirmed or reversed on merits.

Conclusion: The appeal was disposed of and the matter was remitted to the authority concerned for fresh decision in accordance with the Supreme Court's ratio.

---