Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal Upholds Tax Exemption for Christian Society Under Section 11, Citing Precedent and Lack of New Evidence</h1> <h3>ADIT (E), Trust Circle-II, New Delhi Versus Indian Evangelical Team</h3> ADIT (E), Trust Circle-II, New Delhi Versus Indian Evangelical Team - TMI The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal concerned the denial of exemption under section 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to the assessee, a society involved in the promotion of religious activities of the Christian community. The key issues presented and considered in the judgment are as follows:**Issues Presented and Considered:**1. Whether the assessee is entitled to exemption under section 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 despite being involved in the promotion of religious activities of a specific community, i.e., Christianity.2. Whether the assessee trust qualifies as a religious trust and is exempt from the provisions of section 13(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.**Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:****Issue 1: Exemption under section 11**The Assessing Officer had previously denied the exemption to the assessee in several assessment years based on the violation of section 13(1)(b). However, the CIT(A) allowed the appeal in the present assessment year, 2011-12. The Revenue contended that the CIT(A) erred in allowing the exemption, arguing that the assessee's activities were not covered under section 13(1)(b). In response, the assessee's representative highlighted that the Tribunal had consistently ruled in favor of the assessee in previous years. The Tribunal referred to its earlier decision in the case of ADIT (E) Vs. Indian Evangelical Team, where it upheld the assessee's claim for exemption under section 11 based on past precedents. The Tribunal noted that the Revenue failed to present any new material to challenge the previous findings, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue's appeal.**Issue 2: Religious Trust Status**The second issue revolved around whether the assessee trust qualified as a religious trust exempt from section 13(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The CIT(A) had held that the assessee trust was indeed a religious trust and therefore not subject to the provisions of section 13(1)(b). The Revenue argued that the CIT(A) failed to consider the religious nature of the activities undertaken by the assessee. However, the Tribunal, relying on its previous decisions and the lack of new evidence presented by the Revenue, upheld the CIT(A)'s decision and dismissed the Revenue's appeal.**Significant Holdings:**The Tribunal's significant holdings include:- Upholding the CIT(A)'s decision to allow the assessee's exemption under section 11 based on past precedents and lack of new evidence presented by the Revenue.- Affirming the status of the assessee trust as a religious trust exempt from section 13(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, due to the consistent rulings in favor of the assessee in previous years.In conclusion, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the Revenue, maintaining the exemption granted to the assessee under section 11 for the assessment year 2011-12. The judgment emphasized the importance of consistency in decisions and the need for presenting new evidence to challenge established precedents.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found