Civil Appeal Dismissed for Low Tax Effect; Question of Law Remains Unresolved; No Costs Awarded The SC dismissed the civil appeal due to the low tax effect, choosing not to interfere with the impugned order and leaving the question of law unresolved. ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Civil Appeal Dismissed for Low Tax Effect; Question of Law Remains Unresolved; No Costs Awarded
The SC dismissed the civil appeal due to the low tax effect, choosing not to interfere with the impugned order and leaving the question of law unresolved. The Appellant was represented by legal counsel, while the Respondent had no representation. No costs were awarded.
The Supreme Court, comprising T.S. Thakur, CJI, R. Banumathi, and Uday Umesh Lalit, JJ., dismissed the civil appeal due to the low tax effect, refraining from interfering with the impugned order and leaving the question of law open. The Appellant was represented by Mr. Tushar Mehta, ASG, Ms. Niranjana Singh, Mr. D.L. Chidananda, Mr. B. V. Balaram Das, and Mr. Ram Bhaj, while there was no representation for the Respondent. No costs were awarded in this matter.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.