TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Challenge to the final assessment order under Section 73(9) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017; legality of the notifications extending time under Section 168A of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017; and the objection that the impugned order was unsigned in breach of Rule 26 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017.
Outcome: Notice issued to the respondents and, in the meantime, coercive action against the petitioner was restrained.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
